Quote from: tommyl on October 22, 2014, 01:05:59 PM

Quote from: KryptoChild on October 22, 2014, 12:41:40 PM

Quote from: UserRandom on October 21, 2014, 06:43:13 PM

If you look at the next frames you will notice that the number change into 2784623964023x2

It's interesting to notice that 2784623964023 is a prime number, which very likely is not a coincidence, it's moderately large prime. However, as someone said it's probably to small (0x1098FFBC) to be a direct private key in the ECDSA sense of the word, or "secret exponent" as Brainwallet.org calls it. Such "small" numbers are almost certainly in hash tables of people who brute force private keys and would be collected until now. It may be a part of the custom ECDSA implementation as order of ECDSA curve or something, but writing such a custom implementation would require bigger award then 1 BTC so this may be a blind alley.

2784623964023 is not a prime number. It has two factors 11 and 253147633093.

My bad, I've done something wrong on http://www.wolframalpha.com/ and it reported it as a prime.