Quote from: joebob999 on October 23, 2014, 03:28:50 PM

Quote

The wallet is released and it is 100% working decentralized trustless mixing, which has been demonstrated several times and a visual block explorer was built showing how complex the anon system really is

I'm sorry. But without actual code review by the community - I don't care what factors from the outside looking in are used to measure the supposed "anoniminity" of a coin. It isn't enough. It's like a code review of 400,000 lines of code by one developer in six hours.

Sure. He looked at it. But regardless of his experience level - it proves nothing about the security or trustworthiness of the coins claims. How many "code reviews" and external factors have been looking for exploits in Windows? Even with thousands of developers spending millions of man hours "code reviewing" it - it STILL isn't secure.

Software that needs to be secure (in this case anoniminity needs to be secure) is not considered so until it's open sourced. Period.

Quote

all your doing is spreading FUD because I won't open source it. Here is proof http://imgur.com/h8rFt5U or just go download the wallet it test it for your self

Stop it with the FUD accusations. Legitimate concerns are NOT FUD. Saying "I have the best anoniminity technology on the market. Even though my coin is 20th on the market cap and I haven't open sourced it yet - just trust me" is MUCH more misleading than the "FUD" you accuse us of. How about we just drop the terms FUD & SHILL and hold each other accountable to try & discover the truth about any given coin / technology?

Quote

2nd - the trustless anon & xchat was developed after XC's ATH price, so its not a stupid pump game, its real technology, combined with Xchat, which is real tech developed in-house, not a cloned CINNI EM system.

Again. Until it's open sourced no one knows. I have a hunch that it's probably modified code. Or terrible with lots of holes. Because the fact that your coin is 20th on the market cap with like 4 legit contenders - some of which have passed you in the last three month period while your coin has continued to fall. Screams that you need legitimacy more than you need other coins to not clone you. So the "I don't want clones" doesn't really hold water.

Quote

3rd - I'm NOT involved with any scam coins so stop making false allegations

Again. Lets worry about the truth - not what paints who in a bad light. The BlockNET is including coins with developers who in the past have left "investors" out to dry by promising technology and then delivering far far less. Then move on to the next promised project / pump.

I view this as no less than a scam. The fact that you are working with these developers to try and bring value to both their coin and your coin makes you "involved" with these coins, no?

In fact - haven't you kinda made a living by selling the "legitimacy" of XC to pump other coins? Isn't that all this is - just on a much bigger scale?

http://xc-official.com/xcurrency-code-reviews-the-de-facto-standard-of-legitimacy-among-altcoins.html

You're using the fact that you can create pump on small coins as a marketing technique? The reality / truth looks more like this

http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/halcyon/

+2 Good Post