Quote from: Xian01 on October 23, 2014, 08:20:04 PM

http://ia802308.us.archive.org/32/items/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531.103.0.pdf

EHL OH EHL

In one of their examples that they did not mislead the customer citing an example on page 9 of that PDF file they use an example of investors Here is a portion from that.

Code:

Investors who purchased nVIEW stock in purported reliance on these statements sued
nVIEW for securities fraud, alleging that the shipment and production dates were materially
misleading. Id . at 833-35. 4 The Borow court dismissed the claim outright, holding that the
representations amounted to puffery and thus lacked materiality as a matter of law. Id . at 835

If costumers were investors then why are they running as a product sales company instead of a stock investment company. I mean investors are set up differently with a company.

People who by apple phones don't pay for their phones 1 year ahead while being promised to have it within 2 month. Apple phone customers are exactly that consumers not investors. However some do indulge in purchasing stock in the company as investors and enjoy the success of a company that is a success.

However investing in BFL would be a bad choice if the investor looked at their past track record.

I believe the previous post is right in cryptically stating " LOL ", I will say that BFL is on its death throws if that is their best they can do as a MOTION TO DISMISS