Quote from: Foxpup on October 26, 2014, 01:59:42 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on October 25, 2014, 03:29:08 PM

I will provide a very simple example. If a person takes out a loan, then a few years later their house burns down and they lose their job, and as a result they are unable to pay their debt, is this an act of theft? There are many perfectly innocent reasons someone might default on a loan, even without intent of "theft".

There's nothing innocent about that, as there is a very simple solution: insurance. It is grossly negligent to get into debt without insuring your income and assets. If you can't afford insurance, you can't afford debt. It's that simple.

Way to completely avoid the point. There are lots of perfectly innocent reasons one might be left destitute regardless of you willful ignorance and deconstruction of an example rather than the premise itself.

Quote from: Foxpup on October 26, 2014, 01:59:42 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on October 25, 2014, 03:29:08 PM

What you are asking for as a result is a system where people can be judged against under civil law, and then have criminal penalties applied to them WITHOUT DUE PROCESS.

No, I'm not. Learn to read.

Just because you don't understand the results of the policies you support, doesn't mean you don't support those results.

Quote from: Foxpup on October 25, 2014, 03:00:45 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on October 25, 2014, 03:29:08 PM

Obviously fascists such as your self would like to see that changed. Also before you accuse me of making a personal attack, those who advocate for the merger of the corporation and the state are by definition fascists.

And learn the definition of fascism, while you're at it.

"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of State and corporate power."

-Benito Mussolini

You know the definition of fascism better than Mussolini?