Quote from: Foxpup on October 26, 2014, 03:05:40 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on October 26, 2014, 02:39:02 PM

Way to completely avoid the point. There are lots of perfectly innocent reasons one might be left destitute regardless of you willful ignorance and deconstruction of an example rather than the premise itself.

Well, that's what bankruptcy's for.

Bankruptcy is increasingly not an option for most people.

Quote from: Foxpup on October 26, 2014, 03:05:40 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on October 26, 2014, 02:39:02 PM

Just because you don't understand the results of the policies you support, doesn't mean you don't support those results.

Which policies would those be, again? I never said anything about applying criminal penalties for civil judgements. In fact, I explicitly stated that I don't support that, and will not repeat it again.

Quote from: TECSHARE on October 25, 2014, 03:29:08 PM

Quote from: Foxpup on October 25, 2014, 03:00:45 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on October 25, 2014, 01:27:10 PM

So how is my improper choice of investment any different than a bank making a loan to an unfit party? Banks can sue debtors who default on their loans, why do banks get to imprison people as well ON TOP of the lawsuit?

I never said anything about imprisoning people.

Quote from: TECSHARE on October 25, 2014, 01:27:10 PM

Really? So whats this below VVV

Quote from: Foxpup on October 25, 2014, 03:00:45 PM

With freedom comes responsibility. In particular, I expect any free person to be responsible enough to not harm or steal from other people. I see no problem with denying freedom to people who deny their responsibilities. Most civilised justice systems function on this concept. There are worse alternatives.

Quote from: TECSHARE on October 26, 2014, 02:39:02 PM

"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of State and corporate power."

-Benito Mussolini

You know the definition of fascism better than Mussolini?

Quote from: Foxpup on October 26, 2014, 03:05:40 PM

I know there's no citation for that quote earlier than 2002, 57 years after Mussolini's death, and that it is inconsistent with his actual ideology. Do you have any evidence that he actually said or believed that?

Again now you are using revisionist deconstruction of the example, rather than the premise.