Quote from: silvermetal on October 26, 2014, 07:52:19 PM

Quote from: Crestington on October 26, 2014, 07:33:50 PM

Quote from: silvermetal on October 26, 2014, 05:39:02 PM

Quote from: Spoetnik on October 25, 2014, 03:55:08 PM

Quote from: silvermetal on October 25, 2014, 08:32:42 AM

Quote from: BitJohn on October 25, 2014, 12:33:46 AM

I like the idea

You must be joking right? or no... you are serious....really?

And then list it at cryptsy?

Even if you do know that previous coins of Spoetnik (Spaetacuscoin for example) and of his "close" friend digitalindustry (coffeecoin for example) are proven scam coins?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=698844.0

I thought cryptsy had some ethics Roll Eyes

not sure why I thought that Huh

I should have known better when you listed CAPS of course Cheesy

I have never had anything to do with making a coin other than making a miner mod AFTER the coin is made. (i say this DAILY)
I also don't recall every hearing a shred of proof digitalindustry made any coins.. maybe he did and maybe he didn't.
I do know that i have stuck up for him in defending Quark coin because of people lying about it.

There is no proof i have had ANYTHING ever to do with making a coin.. because i never did so it's simply not possible to get proof LOL

No duhh.. you are correct. you (and digitalindustry) never created one single coin. Just because you both lack the knowledge to create one.
The coins you scammed were created by a copy coin service (from Hazard or Shake).

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=208578.0

That digitalindustry did it, was more than obvious with kopimicoin.
I want to show you again, if you missed my first post here: http://www.kopimi.com/kopimi/

You mentioned Quark somewhere....What you can take over from Quark is to use a very fast block time, and at launch set the block time a little bit faster (just like Quark did);
So you can announce it and mine with a blocktime of 10 seconds instead of the 30 or 60 or whatever seconds you announce.

(Hazard is a good suggestion to do this for you because he created flashcoin once: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=222450.0)

I don't think you have any knowledge of coins or you would know that 10 second Blocktimes (based on Quark no less) is a recipe doomed to fail.

Really? I have no knowledge?

Check this page and look to the time stamps:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=701469.msg7927663#msg7927663

To make it easier for you I summarize and calculate it for you:

block 1: 13:03:50
Block 2: 13:04:06 (=16 seconds block time)
block 100: 13:14:18 (=average block time of 612 seconds/100 blocks = 6 seconds!)
block 1000: 14:42:58 (=average block time of 5932 seconds/1000 blocks = 6 seconds!)

With the 30 second blocktime of Quark you would expect:
Block 100 after: 100*30 seconds = 50 minutes. Not 10 minutes after launch
Block 1000 after: 1000*30 seconds = 500 minutes = 8 hours and 20 minutes. Not 1 hour and 38 minutes after launch.

What do I not understand of coins Roll Eyes

Since you are so educated Roll Eyes

in coins you can check it yourself in the Quark block explorer:

http://qrk.blockr.io/

You can just fill in block 1, 2, 3, 4 and look to the time stamps. Quark was mined every 10 seconds or something, not the expected 30 seconds.

And yes the fast block time caused a lot of orphans...just like it did with flashcoin.
You can read the frustration of the miners after launch: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg2774252#msg2774252

That is not what the Blocktime is set at that causes that but the starting difficulty. With a low starting difficulty and a longer retarget time you get what is called instamining where the first blocks are mined at a much faster rate until the hashrate evens out.

FlashCoin actually had 10 second Blocktimes but anything under 30 seconds (as you mentioned with Quark) causes a lot of Orphan Blocks because of the latency between miners.