Quote from: iCEBREAKER on October 25, 2014, 10:36:00 PM

and please GFY in your commie pinko arse! Kiss

I repeat once again. Your arrogant, patronizing comments, full of sarcastic, cynical and emotionally demeaning smileys/emoticons self evidently prove your mental attitude towards treatment of other human beings. You are a sociopath.
You have no remorse and no consideration for the fact that your company has exploited hundreds of people.
People lost their savings or got into debt. Many people lost their accomodation, because they couldn't pay up the rent.
Obviously, you think that it has been some kind of game and you find whole situation entertaining. You obviously think that these people in order for you to be able to fiddle with your company and people's money like little kids play with their toys.

Your houses/cars should be taken away from you to pay off the money you owe to customers adn your name should be made public to everyone around you as a warning. You should take consequences of your inconsiderate actions, you muppet.

You must have some kind of brain damage. You would be a great investor at Wall Street - Max Keiser, nicely explained your type of person in this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnuCGp_RWDM

"Plenty of intelligent people become judges. The logical fallacy in your (always and never) statement is: No True Scotsman."

I recommend to you to go out there and, actually check up what "No True Scotsman" illogical fallacy is.
Just because you are not capable of understanding the argument it doesn't make it an illogical fallacy. My point is based on logical conclusionm asserting what is intelligent behaviour and what is not.
As you cannot understand it then I will briefly explain to you how the laws are being generated, so if you are willing to, will make you understand why such profession as judge is not an intelligent profession.

Politicians are responsible for introducing new laws and policies. Almost every politican knows very little about anything relevant to improvement of the quality of society/natural environment. For example, how to technologically improve the safety of roads and transport system, how to eradicate social factors perpetuating homelessness, crime and lack of education, how to improve agricultural yield while making it more environmentally sustainable etc. Human/social problems since the dawn of men have always been of technical nature not of political nature. Politicians usually come from legal or financial background not technical/scientific background. Because they know so little, the only thing they are capable of doing is imposing some temporary, inefficient patchwork in the form of new law or policy. All laws/policies are meaningless paper proclamations which do not eradicate the root causes of the problems but provide a temporary relief. Laws are pseudo solutions which generate even more problems. It's sweeping up the problem under the carpet. For example, politicians introduce laws to punish people who developed susceptibility to become addicted to certain drugs by imprisoning them instead of trying to eradicate the root causes making all these people develop this suceptibility in the first place (the root causes would be poverty, unsustainable or abusive parenting, unsustainable educational system, value system disorder in society etc). It's easier for them to infinitely introduce pointless laws then make an effort to educate themselves and work on efficient solutions. lf laws were to improve the quality of social well-being, then considering the number of laws which had been constantly introduced, we would have been living in paradise by now. Instead we are living in more and more deeply distorted and controlled society.

There you have, the explanation why becoming a judge is not an intelligent thing to do, in the first place. Just becasue the law says something and just because your company has "won", it doesn't make the decision intelligent.

"I don't GAS what your education is; your Marxist Freudian psychology is a folk science which predates the cognitive revolution and is thus invalid on face. "

This is your another bullshit assumption and illogical fallacy. Nothing in my brief comments gave any hint of idea that I may follow some Marxist ideology or Freudian way of "psychology".

I'm neither interested in Marxist ideology not I am interesed in obsolete ideas of Freud. What I am interested in, are up to date understandings of human behaviour and psychology. If you had really explored the concepts which have evolved since cognitive revolution then you would not have any problem with understanding what I have written.
As you come up with illogical fallacies and fail to understand the human behaviour (otherwise you wouldn't be behaving the way you are) I will recommend you some interesting YT videos with up to date scientific research:
- "Introduction to Human Behavioral Biology". Sseries of lectures by Dr. Sapolsky from Stanford University.
- "Stress, Portrait of a Killer" documentary (the original title is different).
- "It's Genetic". Part 1 and Part 2.
- "PBS Nova S35E02 Ghost in your Genes" - Genetics and epigenetics.
- Alfie Kohn - The Deadly Effects of "Tougher Standards". Presentation.
- "Jacque Fresco - Free Will - Nov. 2, 2010"
- "Sam Harris - Free Will" - Presenation from Festival Of Dangerous Ideas 2012 in Sydney Opera House

Hopefully you will learn something about yourself from these.

"Besides, I assure you I've studied cognition and critical theory (including CLS) more deeply and at much higher levels than you have. "

If you did then it is time to update your knowledge to what science has discoverd recently.
Despite that, I'm not interested in Marxist related philosophies. I'm interested in scientific research.

"The difference is that I can entertain those trendy ideas without believing them, while your credulous pea brain provided for a willing convert to sophomoric pop psychology"

First of all, I do not BELIEVE in ANYTHING. I CONSIDER the most probable (rational) POSSIBILITIES by trying to take into account all facts I have been lucky to be aware that science has discovered so far...

"Pathologizing disagreement with mental critiques of your opponent is a hallmark of Marxists of well. "

Another assumption, not backed by any evidence and illogicla fallacy.
Nothing implies that I am Marxist. Just, becasue someone cares about human and environmental well being doesn't mean that they must ba a communist/Marxist etc.
It seems that you cannot think outside the box, so your limited understanding seem to revolve around obsolete political ideas of Communism, Fasciscm, Capitalism, Technocracy, Feudal system etc. You cannot comprehend that there may be someone not following any ideology and that there may be something else than these social systems and that someone may not follow any political ideology.
I follow science and intelligence not some bullshit political or religious ideology.

Your "Go F*ck Yourself in your commie pinko arse" comment proved again how primitive and mentally deficient you are.
I really wonder why so people here, humiliate themselves by still trying to strike some kind of deal with the person like you.