Quote from: CryptoGuu on October 29, 2014, 12:44:57 PM

Quote from: 3PostsTotal on October 29, 2014, 04:38:04 AM

Quote

It turned out that jl777 was manipulating the market and inflating the price of this asset(he has done this several times since with other NXT assest) with my name on it, and convincing others that I was responsible for their investment without my knowledge.

http://blog.bluemeanie.net/2014/10/nxtautodac-jl777-stolen-nxt.html

Turns out, he is pretty open about manipulating his own market.

Quote from: jl777 on October 24, 2014, 01:45:38 AM

Quote from: jl777 on October 24, 2014, 01:38:48 AM

more BTC being sent to bittrex for you, mr. whale
soon you can dump again, but it is a slow BTC block

James

there, another 10 BTC for the whale dumper

and another, so there is 20 more BTC for you

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=684090.msg9309709#msg9309709

Some might call that an awesome support from a dev but others might call it manipulation. Especially since he openly claimed that his assets are in excess of one million prior to Supernet which netted how much?

May I ask a question? If someone with that net worth has the crypto to spend to create FUD against a competitor, would he? Especially since he seems to be willing to vocally and nonchalantly send BTC to stave off a dump (could he have caused it? Valid question since he is more interested in market dynamics then hiring help).

Is Blocknet a scam? That's A LOT of coins who would have to be in on it. A lot of people who have their own plans and are making their own names for themselves. A lot of plans which have people excited for the future of this technology. And you are going to tell me that ripping people off excites them more then developing their platforms?

There is nothing stated in this thread that convinces me that Dan is a scammer. But the link I provided above has caused me great consideration over the past few days. BTCD Investor here for what I thought were the right reasons and when I see Bullshit threads like this it pisses me off.

Propaganda for the sake of propaganda is crap.

You can't call SuperNET a scam newbie.

Many of you will have noticed certain similarities between SuperNET and a new organisation called BlockNET. Whilst the latter is a constantly-evolving undertaking, it seems that there are several key differences. We would encourage you to visit the thread, ask questions and find out more for yourself about the relative approaches, if you are considering investing in one or both ventures. There has been much misunderstanding about both BlockNET and SuperNET and greater clarity will benefit everyone.

A key difference is the business approach. BlockNET is collecting money through their ITO to pay developers for their new software, whereas the SuperNET ICO funds are being held to provide stable value, reflected in the NAV (the value of SuperNET should not fall below the value of the currencies held). James is doing all the coding in return for an equity stake in SuperNET, and is also adding a large number of revenue-generating assets of his own (these total far more than the value of his own shares).

SuperNET ICO funds will also be used to purchase shares in coins and revenue-generating services. SuperNET is also entering into revenue-share agreements, without taking an equity stake in these. BlockNET will make money from the services it offers but the ITO money will not be used to purchase a stake in promising companies. SuperNET will also be returning income to coin communities, to stakers and for further tech development.

The philosophy of SuperNET is to align interests between SuperNET holders, coin communities and devs, and the companies that provide services. The money flow provides shared incentives for success, strengthening all of them and working for their mutual benefit. This business model was a conscious decision taken by James and offers a strong platform for future expansion.

supernet is a scam, you say? Grin