Quote from: atcsecure on October 30, 2014, 08:02:40 PM

Quote from: URSAY on October 30, 2014, 08:01:42 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on October 30, 2014, 07:54:05 PM

Quote from: URSAY on October 30, 2014, 07:46:49 PM

Quote from: synechist on October 30, 2014, 07:36:55 PM

Quote from: URSAY on October 30, 2014, 07:31:45 PM

Quote from: synechist on October 30, 2014, 05:08:08 PM

- Specifically, XC's funding comes from Dan's corporation, which has pioneered IP over RF in marine environments.

If you want to bring up Dan's corporation in an official statement and mention that it funds XC development then there should not be a problem naming that corporation, right? If XC is official as the name suggests and everything is legit then transparency shouldn't be an issue.

Clear information helps investors make sound decisions.

It's ATC Corp.

Was it incorporated in MA.?

Yes it was

I've discovered an ATC Corp. and ATC Corporation in MA, both dissolved in the 80s. I can provide those links to show I am not fudding if needed. Any further search suggestions?

Seeing how I was in high school then, those are not relevant entities

So maybe we don't have the name right?

[EDIT] I've found what I was looking for. I'm not trying to work against you here Dan. I just needed some personal verification after the pre-mine issue came up and seemed somewhat brushed off.