Quote from: StealthCoin1 on October 31, 2014, 12:16:04 PM

Quote from: LD2164 on October 31, 2014, 12:13:42 PM

Quote from: StealthCoin1 on October 31, 2014, 12:11:44 PM

Quote from: ib88 on October 31, 2014, 12:08:58 PM

Quote from: StealthCoin1 on October 31, 2014, 12:04:20 PM

i'm still supporting blocknet and i think it's way more superior than the scam supernet but the only one problem i'm not support is the 2500btc, i think it is too much. i also believed they will not able to raise the 2500btc, probably 1000btc at best. i think it's best to return those sell on coingate to their respective participating devs. basically of those 5% of each coins which sell over coingate should returning to their developer.

I can't make much sense of your post but the minimum threshold for the project to go ahead is 850BTC which has already been achieved. In fact I'd wager that 1000BTC has been surpassed as well.

what i try to say is those 20% sells of participating coins over coingate should return to their respective dev for each coins. if you still don't get this then i think you're dumb.

I see you removed the part where you said you don't think it is fair that Dan gets all the money... Maybe then you have realized that he doesn't get all the money, all the devs share the money in their capacity to jointly develop the blocknet.

i have remove nothing. all participating coins should get something, i think it's best to return the 20% at coingate to them.

yeah I must have been seeing things then, that is more likely than a runaway troll in a forum...
please.
ignore.