Quote from: CryptoGretzky on November 01, 2014, 11:27:39 AM

Quote from: DreamSpace on November 01, 2014, 11:26:13 AM

Quote from: adhitthana on November 01, 2014, 11:21:35 AM

Quote from: EvilDave on November 01, 2014, 11:01:15 AM

If your currency/project can't take a Spoetnik attack, and feels the need to take legal action against him......it's not a very good sign.
If S. is just trolling, then no worries, but he's not the only guy bringing up the red flags, and there is actually some evidence in the form of chatlogs.

This is no longer about the currency but about a legitimate businessman's reputation.

but honestly is that something new here, i dont think so, i watched the fudstorm against syscoin, experienced the sharexcoin-exchange, moolah/mintpal, cryptorush
i saw the war between the cryptonotes and so on, it's nothing new and nothing special, the only real option is to show that the accusations are not true.
but if they are true i think we are going deeper into the rabbit hole then ever... don't know which will be the results after the waves calm down, but i bought
my popcorn.

cheers

The difference is that Dan is not an anon dev. His real life business reputation is being slandered here and MILLIONS of XC marketcap evaporated due to these fudsters which causes real monetary damages that you can measure.

alt market caps evaporate all the time mainly because no one uses the coin. its going to be impossible to prove that fud caused the downfall.