Quote from: synechist on November 02, 2014, 03:38:10 PM

Quote from: Revelation on November 02, 2014, 03:33:25 PM

Quote from: synechist on November 02, 2014, 03:30:33 PM

Quote from: synechist on November 02, 2014, 03:25:26 PM

Quote from: EmilioMann on November 02, 2014, 03:22:52 PM

Quote from: synechist on November 02, 2014, 03:20:16 PM

Quote from: McHammer on November 02, 2014, 03:18:58 PM

whos cryptoboh?

This fine fellow: https://twitter.com/CryptoBoh

Crypto Boh = Mr. Boh = Pookielax31 from shadowcoin/shadowcash community

I'd like to be clear that I have nothing against ShadowCash as a technology (i.e. I think it is legit) and I also have nothing against its developer, Rynomster. In fact, my experience of him is that he's a nice guy.

The smear campaign we've all witnessed has been planned and propagated by a bunch of SDC bagholders/pumpers. The dev team is not implicated at all as far as I'm aware.

Just to flesh out the claim I've just made, about three weeks ago I was notified that this smear campaign was being planned.

I had access to the screenshots that were leaked a few days ago. Oddly enough they were presented back then as pastebins of IRC chat logs.

Whatever these materials originally were, this smear campaign has been a long time coming and I have no reasonable doubt as to its origins.

It doesnt matter if Shadow is shit, probably it is. The point is that you guys are no better.

I think the point is that we don't launch smear campaigns.

Recall that XC has simply developed a huge arsenal of tech over five months without a pump and without slandering competitors.

We do not need, and will never resort to, unethical means to compete.

My hope here is that the public will learn from this and respond accordingly in future.
Nobody gets to discredit a project dishonestly and successfully repeat the procedure the next time.
Next time we'll all be better at recognising internet trash for what it is.