Quote from: synechist on November 02, 2014, 04:37:32 PM

Quote from: 00Smurf on November 02, 2014, 04:05:50 PM

Quote from: synechist on November 02, 2014, 03:30:33 PM

Quote from: synechist on November 02, 2014, 03:25:26 PM

Quote from: EmilioMann on November 02, 2014, 03:22:52 PM

Quote from: synechist on November 02, 2014, 03:20:16 PM

Quote from: McHammer on November 02, 2014, 03:18:58 PM

whos cryptoboh?

This fine fellow: https://twitter.com/CryptoBoh

Crypto Boh = Mr. Boh = Pookielax31 from shadowcoin/shadowcash community

I'd like to be clear that I have nothing against ShadowCash as a technology (i.e. I think it is legit) and I also have nothing against its developer, Rynomster. In fact, my experience of him is that he's a nice guy.

The smear campaign we've all witnessed has been planned and propagated by a bunch of SDC bagholders/pumpers. The dev team is not implicated at all as far as I'm aware.

Just to flesh out the claim I've just made, about three weeks ago I was notified that this smear campaign was being planned.

I had access to the screenshots that were leaked a few days ago. Oddly enough they were presented back then as pastebins of IRC chat logs.

Whatever these materials originally were, this smear campaign has been a long time coming and I have no reasonable doubt as to its origins.

They were originally and have always been my skype conversation with Prom, that he has authenticated them with a post in here. There was no planned smear campaign, someone leaked those conversations out of the SDC dev team room without permission when we were discussing whether or not to join Blocknet.

The Dev team can not control community members actions. Every coin community has its different community members. Whether it be BLOCKnet, XC, XST, SDC , BC, DRK, XMR etc.

Smurf: No. Even Prometheus stated that the conversations were presented out of context in order to appear in a different light.

No planned smear campaign? A dedicated website was launched for this.

Furthermore I was privy to several progressive edits of conversations as the people behind this crafted the most negative presentation they could.

I'm not denying you had conversations with Prom; I'm also not denying that you were caught in the middle of a horrible state of affairs.

Lastly I'm not blaming the SDC dev team. As far as I know they were not involved.

But there is absolutely no denying the reality of a smear campaign against Dan, XC, and the Blocknet.

How were they out of context? They were in chronological order, and pertained to the relevant parts of the conversation.

Now i will say that who ever posted some of the text snippets did indeed post them out of context as they had none of my side of the conversation and it missed conversation both before and after the snippets that was relevant.

What dedicated website? I have not seen one. Now to play the devils advocate who's to say it wasn't launched by someone in the negative towards the shadow community just to paint us in a bad light. How can you prove who did or did not launch a website.

This whole thing stinks of politics. Irrespective of anything "proof of this, proof of that" the only proof anyone should need is Proof of delivery. Let the tech of any coin speak for itself as long as its presented in a truthful manner, and if using opensource code it has the relevant copyrights of the original coders.

And by god this goes for any coins community members if you have an opinion on another coin or techincal specs of a coin or a coins technology, at least back it up with proof or technical papers or find someone that knows about the tech to educate you. There are ways to ask questions and discuss technology with out coming across as trolling or fudding or whatever.