Dan said he wasn't involved with Halcyon:
Dan said he was not the Halcyon dev nor did he write any of it's code.
Do you or do you not have any evidence he did?
If you do just come out in a straightforward manner and show what this evidence is?
All you did was come out with another rambling post.
What you did not do was provide any evidence that Dan lied.
Prometheus said in the chatlogs that Dan was the dev of hal and promotheus do not deny the chatlogs. So Dan lied.
This is exactly what people need to realize.
The chatlogs are real according to Prometheus' statement. Which means Dan lied. Or an alternative would be that Prometheus lied about Dan being the dev of Hal. But that would be inconsistent with Dan's statement claiming that Prometheus is "ethical". And besides, why would Prometheus need to lie about Dan being the dev of Hal anyways? What could he possibly gain from that?
So the logical conclusion: Dan lied.
Anyone see any other inconsistencies?
What I find interesting about the entire debacle is how angry people are at the truth coming out as "organized FUD"
Like it's our responsibility to spin it in a good light. No one is angry at Dan for being at the least an absolute moron (highly unlikely) or probably a borderline scammer.
They are angry at us for openly discussing it.
IMO after bittrex offers the buywall people are going to unload the blocknet down to the point where it's under the target fund raising goal (I believe bittrex had about 1/3 of the total sales?)