Quote from: brg444 on November 05, 2014, 02:32:43 AM

Quote from: NewLiberty on November 04, 2014, 03:25:51 PM

Quote from: Odalv on November 04, 2014, 03:20:35 PM

Quote from: cypherdoc on November 04, 2014, 03:08:44 PM

scenario: SC + sidecoin + innovation + MM + scBTC

is it possible for scBTC to take advantage of the innovation or is that impossible b/c the SC MM is specific to sidecoin?

I do not understand how creating more units (sidecoin) can be advantage.
I think SC + innovation + scBTC is better chain. And if it is better than MC then innovation will be implemented into MC.

Except that we know from experience that this is not true. MC ossifies or has unbreakable social contracts, so better doesn't get implemented into MC.

Instead what SC offers is that MC may 95% migrate to it and leave behind those that don't agree that the change is better.

Except that for the SC to become the mainchain it requires the same consensus that a hard fork to the original BTC mainchain would so "ossification" is not an eligible argument IMO

except that the dynamics are different. the hard fork we had with 0.8.1 was abrupt and caused a 20 block disparity right after it was introduced.

SC's otoh may encourage a slow creep as migration moves to the SC over years time.

brg444, do you know if scBTC can take advantage of a faster tx time when the SC simultaneously creates a sidecoin?