Quote from: wharfplow on November 05, 2014, 10:24:25 PM

Quote from: RichardT on November 05, 2014, 07:37:57 PM

Quote from: wharfplow on November 05, 2014, 02:20:28 PM

Yes dan chose to deal with the wrong people and was dragged into this mess.

Can only assume ignorance on dan's behalf. A smart project lead developer would not knowingly associate themselves with a few of the most hated members in crypto.

You really think Dan was ignorant or oblivious to all that?

Consider this: as outsiders, even you and I know about the shadiness of the people Dan worked with. How can Dan not know? He had direct communication and dealings with those people not just once, but on multiple occasions. He is fully aware of the unethical behavior that he is engaged in.

Man, some people are really brainwashed. Throwing all logic and common sense out the window just to support this guy.

I'm not supporting him. I just don't believe a claim can be made againt him. All the evidence is hearsay.

Actually no, the evidence are not hearsay. The skype screenshots in which Prometheus states that Dan is a part of his team and is the dev of Hal has been confirmed to be true (by Prom himself). How is that hearsay evidence?

Hearsay would be if a third party were to state: "Prometheus told me that Dan is on his team and is the dev of hal" without Prometheus confirming that it is true. See the difference?

It's funny, the line of defense from the start of all this up until now have been:
1. Those skype screenshots are fake. Dan is not working with Prom nor is he the dev of Hal.
2. When the screenshots were confirmed to be true, the defense turned into: Oh, Dan must of have not known that he was engaging in unethical behavior
3. And now you're saying that all evidence were hearsay anyway

What's going to be the next defense now that I've explained why the evidence is not just hearsay?