Quote from: Vod on November 05, 2014, 08:36:58 PM

Quote from: bl4kjaguar on November 05, 2014, 08:34:09 PM

Quote from: RodeoX on November 05, 2014, 08:30:51 PM

Quote from: bl4kjaguar on November 05, 2014, 08:12:07 PM

Quote from: tattooist on November 05, 2014, 07:29:04 PM

first case....... chessplaying ghosts

Yes. Correspondence with the dead proven by Prof. Eisenbeiss.

Who from the non-god position will correlate the simplest explanation with the observations?

Two guys played a chess game? That is all the article outlines. One of the guys claims it was not him playing chess, but a dead person. There is nothing beyond that to examine. Not only is that not proof it is not evidence either. It is a claim.

A claim backed up with impressive statistics and Salient Points that (apparently) will not be explained by the skeptics in this thread.

I can explain it with one word. Liar.

Professor Eisenbeiss is a liar for sure? Which observations support that claim?

Now let's see how you avoid my questions...