Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 06, 2014, 02:10:31 AM

Quote from: tmfp on November 06, 2014, 12:42:04 AM

That's unnecessarily vague, it makes me ask is it either

a) They have proof of the transaction but have decided not to share it. That would be a policy level decision to ignore the community, as such as it is represented by Gleb asking a pretty simple question. Why would they want to take such an opaque stance?

b) They don't have definite proof to offer, which in turn means
1) It didn't happen, the membership was never paid for and they ^^ are prepared to straight out lie about it
2) It did happen, but they can't provide proof because there is none to provide? If Bitpay can't or won't provide that info, is there any other way it could be done satisfactorily?

If KnC used Bitpay, shouldn't BitPay have sent dollars to the Foundation, rather than bitcoin? (But TBF promised to take only bitcoins, didn't they?)

Could it be that KnC paid the invoice "timely" well after the election?

Sure they did, just like KnC promised to not mine, thus looking out for their customer base, TBF promised to ONLY accept BTC, till they took a gander at somebody else's playbook that is.

At 54 years old, I may have turned into a kook, but I can still motherefuckin' see, and that looks like to me they NOW accept credit cards. Fuck, these bastards could be the foundation for some bartering entity but accept credit cards to help fill their coffer so that they can better advance the movement of how bartering oppose to credit card transactions will benefit the world. Roll Eyes