Quote from: brg444 on November 06, 2014, 02:17:59 AM

Quote from: Adrian-x on November 06, 2014, 02:11:47 AM

Quote from: brg444 on November 06, 2014, 01:54:25 AM

Quote from: Adrian-x on November 06, 2014, 01:50:52 AM

so your saying NO it is categorically imposable for a situation to arise where where I MM and as a miner I can get 70% of my income from MM SC and 30% while MM bitcoin?

or just saying NO becaue your not reading? and trimming posts and sporting nonce.

If you mean from mining SCs (note the s) then yes absolutely. Because that probably translates to a considerable amount of sidechains splitting the 70% pie with the other 30% going to the BTC chain.

That sounds plausible to me.

So your suggestion is miners have no use for the millions of dollars representing that 30% right? Yup you right they should probably drop it!

that's not economically practical, make a futures trade on some basket of SC's and 51% attack Bitcoin that economically incentive.

Hmm no. Bitcoin is the most secure chain. There is no more economic incentive to attack it with sidechains than there is without.

Hmm Why? I Get 70% income from SC I get 30% form MM BTC - if I collude with other pools to use 100% of my mining power to attack Bitcoin, I only lose 30% of my income.

as block rewards diminish over time i could Get 95% income from SC I get 5% form MM BTC - if I collude with other pools to use 100% of my mining power to attack Bitcoin, I only lose 5% of my income.

the intensives that prevent a 51% attack today are diminished as SC take value out of the Bitcoin Blockchain.