Quote from: leewilson on November 06, 2014, 06:52:32 PM

Quote from: sysco32 on November 06, 2014, 06:34:31 PM

Quote from: leewilson on November 06, 2014, 06:22:44 PM

Quote from: sysco32 on November 06, 2014, 06:16:41 PM

Quote from: notsofast on November 06, 2014, 06:12:43 PM

I don't foresee any problem with buybacks bringing the invested BTC below the go-ahead threshold.

It should be fairly simple to create another mini-ITO using BTC at potentially a slightly discounted price on CoinGateway (since presumably they're still set up for it), to make up the shortfall.

Or revise the go-ahead threshold downward.

Or make up the shortfall in a private deal with a single angel investor.

My point is, there are several ways to ensure the continuation of the project while still honouring its initial rules.

I was thinking the same.I don't see the point to stop this project,while there are several of us who wants this to succeed.There is always a way to make it happen.

In other words, both of you believe the continuation of changing the rules set by the coin itself until it works is a perfectly fine business model.
Bravo.

What about those who have pulled back the curtain and do not like what they see?

We are not talking about the business model,don't go on sidetrack here.What we are saying is that in case we don't reach the 850BTC amount,it should not be an obstacle to stop the project.

For the person who doesn't like what they see,there is always an option to trade it back i think.Even with a small loss,but it is possible./Always have to count with a loss even in the real world/

I am not sidetracking, you on the other hand are. This is everything about the business model. You are recommending that the ito be changed in order to force the continuation of the project if need be. And to those that wanted out you are telling to eat a loss. Why can't you eat the loss? and stop thinking the rules should be changed to suit your opinion for the day.

The thing is i am going to eat my losses,as i always did.The person who thinks that the only possibility is gain...is a fool.I am not recommending nothing regarding changing the ITO.
All i am saying that there is always a way to make it happen even if you don't change the ITO.
So far all i see that people are just throwing mud at the project and each other.
The option is simple: you like it than invest.
If you don't like it than: don't invest,change back your tokens and yes,you have to eat your losses/you are already loosing even with the exchange,so there is no other option/...and don't stay here throwing mud.