1) Dan drained the XC premine
We all knew from the very start that the premine would be used.
The actual point not addressed:
1) Dan drained the XC premine when there was a promise of transparency. And Synechist lied saying that it was drained by mid-September when in fact there was money being taken out of it up until late October according to the blockchain.
Are you serious with this? Is there some sort of "XC community guide to not addressing the actual issues and deflecting arguments" written by Synechist? Why do you pick out only parts of statements and address them as if none of the other text exists?
And you sidestep every single point on the list there. Congrats. Maybe XC should hire you as Synechist's assistant in the propaganda department.
Or if you're trolling though, then hats off I guess. At this point it's getting a bit ridiculous. You keep saying there's no evidence despite the fact that I just posted evidence which you conveniently left out of your reply.
Was HAL pumped after the Dan Metcalf code review which was presented to people as if he was an unbiased third party? The whole purpose of a code review is to have an unbiased third party review the code. Insiders don't count.