Quote from: Pride-C-CEX on November 07, 2014, 10:44:17 PM

Quote from: KidCrypto on November 07, 2014, 10:14:51 PM

Quote from: Pride-C-CEX on November 07, 2014, 08:34:24 PM

Quote from: KidCrypto on November 07, 2014, 06:22:49 PM

Quote from: UCoinTeam on November 06, 2014, 07:33:38 PM

Quote from: kryptologist on November 05, 2014, 08:56:13 PM

Why not post the video you submitted to C-CEX?

Creating a video isn't necessarily(https://c-cex.com/?id=ico):

Quote

Create a short video introducing yourself and your coin and explain the basic ideas behind it and why it could be successful (optional if POD or CS verification done or in progress).

HUGE RED FLAG

This was literally just changed on the C-CEX website. Pride had told everyone that ICOs MUST submit a video. Now we find out you DID NOT submit a video and the C-CEX rules have changed.

Is C-CEX that is running this ICO? C-CEX has just lost a lot of respect IMO. I will be withdrawing my funds. C-CEX has lied to us and that's a fact.

Don't get equinoxed by an anonymous ICO guys.

Why do you think people will invest in an anomymous ICO? You have got to be crazy.

We felt it was redundant to force all devs when hosting an ICO to do the video if PoD/Coinsource was already in progress, it is not a conspiracy I can assure you.

Hi Pride,

I thought you were a good guy but none of this makes sense to me.

How is it redundant to requires devs to make a video? Did you know coinsource doesn't even have videos of the developers they "verify"? After the equinox ICO disaster coin source released all the information they had. What they gave us was a fake id with a picture of a person that is not the dev. In what way does this replace a video of the developer talking about their coin?

Fact: C-Cex hosts Ucoin on their exchange with the ICO rule that they must provide a video. Dev is questioned about this and asked to post this video. Then C-CEX changes their ICO rules because no video was supplied even though the ICO was already taking place on C-CEX.

Based on this fact, you lied to everyone on your exchange.

You are talking about a coin that I have near zero knowledge of, if you feel like I lied to you then please contact me as my info is public and we can discuss it before tossing out baseless accusations. I was still under the impression that PoD and/or Coinsource was something people looked at for credibility, if this has changed how does that relate to lying? We didn't change the policy due to "Ucoin" we changed it because it was already an internal policy that we needed to make public after reviewing redundancies in work flow. If you want to speak of this further you are welcome to contact me on skype @ Pride C-CEX. This forum is no longer a place for sane dialogues.

I will try to make this very clear for you:

You told everyone a video is required to add an ICO to C-CEX. Ucoin ICO was launched on your exchange with these rules in place. It is only after the developer is questioned about this, do you change the rules on your exchange. In what way did you not lie to your users?