Quote from: synechist on November 08, 2014, 10:03:39 AM

Quote from: leewilson on November 08, 2014, 07:37:01 AM

TL;DR

The US Federal Government among others appear to own any and all development and coins held and which have been held by Dan Metcalf since January 28, 2014 according to public records.
----------------------

This is either an attempted doxxing, or, if the documents are fabricated or apply to a different individual, a continuation of the smear campaign against Dan and the Blocknet.

Lee do you realise how unethical either of these alternatives are? You deserve to be sued.

As for your claims about its implications for the Blocknet, they are, as is your custom, inflated and speculative (which is to say, their correct denotation is either "FUD" or "conspiracy theorism").

Quote

when you know you have a federal tax lien and other liens issued against you knowing that they claim anything and everything until it is paid and you choose to take innocent peoples money and risk it all is revolting.

Are you joking? In what world do Blocknet tokens belong to Dan? They don't. Moving on...

Quote

I have no reason to lie. I was not invested in any of the coins in the network. I ran across the original prom chatlog and took an interest. Simple as that. This complete post is my opinion from reviewing the instruments found of record.

That's backwards. You'd only have no reason to lie if you wereinvested in the Blocknet or a participating coin. Someone with a stake in the Blocknet who came out with this information would be intrinsically believable. You're in the opposite position here, thus you are not believable.

Furthermore your post history is a string of paranoid hypothetical suspicions with manifestly insufficient basis given the facts, so you're clearly biased against the Blocknet and Dan.

This makes you a prime candidate for not presenting the facts truthfully.

Get lost, troll.

I think it is hard for you to actually step back and see this from outside the box. If you stop your worshiping of the magical super dev you might be able to come up for air briefly and see what is really going on.

That being said, this is not even close to a doxxing of Dan (he has already told me specifically that he can't be doxxed because he already made himself known publicly).
This is a public service announcement to both investors and non investors alike. You harboring ill feelings towards me is asinine. Clean up your own house.

False? continuation of a smear campaign? Listen up Bumsbeen, a "smear campaign" has never existed regarding Dan, yourself or blocknet. Get over yourselves.

Either of the only two of your opinions that you are presenting as the only possibilities of fact and are unethical and lawsuit worthy? First off, you trying to make your opinion absolute facts in my world does not work on me Giftzwerg. You must be thinking of these turd worthy ezines/blogs and cult followers you deal with. The only people being sued should be you and Dan. Period. The practices that you chose to sell your wares and that you continue to use are inexcusable and in my opinion criminal on multiple levels. Multiple members of bct have brought up your PR as ghastly and even have members resigning.

As a matter of fact all of the blocknet tokens belonged to Dan until some were sold for btc and other alts. I never was specific to blocknet tokens. I mention all of the currencies together. You're not trying to isolate one segment of the statement out to try and discredit the whole thing are you? And technically now, all of the excess block he owns. There is nothing legally binding that says otherwise. What matters though is that he didn't want to hold blocknet tokens he wanted btc and boy did he get some. The problem is those are considered property and technically should be seized.

Backwards, eh? So if I would have bought blocknet tokens without doing any research and afterwards I did research then and only then would it be "believable" to you.
Do you really believe your own drivel? And again, scary way to force people to buy your wares. If I don't purchase, then I am not allowed an opinion. Makes sense.

Quote

Furthermore your post history is a string of paranoid hypothetical suspicions with manifestly insufficient basis given the facts, so you're clearly biased against the Blocknet and Dan.

"Look at the big brain on Brett" On a serious note, if you went to any type of higher learning institute I am certain you did not pay for it so whoever did please find them and apologize for wasting their time and money. It just didn't work out for you. Go pop off some fireworks.
What you consider suspicions for the most part were direct and easy to follow questions that not only I was asking. Many of these questions still have not been answered and those that were were usually vague and shifty, the rest were deleted from your thread. So instead of answering those questions which most all could have been prevented by actions taken previous to even launching the ito, you instead come to this thread to continue confabulating or deceiving. If for instance any hypotheses regarding this new information and how the IRS will possibly handle it I am sure we could just call the number at the top of the document and ask them. That should clear it right up. Good thinking.

Troll? I have yet to get off topic. Do you understand what the word troll means? Or are you just trying to be mean with bullying tactics?