Quote from: redsn0w on November 10, 2014, 08:38:50 AM

Can I ask you : is it a real problem for you ? You are still a trustwhorty user but you are not more in the defaultTtus list.

It is a problem for me because this is completely absurd the lengths staff went to to cast me as a bad guy while they themselves practice exactly what they accused me of on a daily basis. Also I am some how supposed to know it is ok for them but not for me. They threw me under a bus so they don't have to acknowledge their own abuses. All I was doing was defending myself when the staff refused to do anything about it, then they punished me for it punitively, even after I fixed the mistake of value in the trust. This is a problem for me because I was minding my own business and this was instigated against me FOR NO REASON to begin with.

Quote from: hashie on November 10, 2014, 08:53:48 AM

TECSHARE, don't bite off more than what you can chew.

It is very clear that 'jrretirement' is a sockpuppet of yours, after he was absent on the forums for months and suddenly jumps into attacking Armis and posts exclusively in the thread (minutes after it was posted, this was after a complete absence from the forum by the way).

1. You left trust feedback out of spite when you are trying to rip people off with overpriced listings, and someone pointed out a cheaper deal.

2. You used sockpuppets to sling mud and vitriol at the victim.

3. I'm leaving both of your accounts negative feedback over this.

Stop, apologize, and burn your sockpuppet. You are not going to make things better for you.

PS: This is from a hero member. You're going to get default-trusted negatives if you try to bring any more sockpuppets into this thread.

1. Asking for what I paid for for an item is not "ripping people off" or "overpriced". If that was the truth no one would ever purchase these items and I would have zero reason to list them correct? Additionally you CLAIM it is a ripoff, but many people GLADLY PAY the fair price of COST because they are assured I am not going to run off with their money.

2. Absolutely not. Just because I have supporters and I tell them about this thread doesn't make them my sock puppets. I use no alternative names here. I would ask the staff to confirm that we have no IP correlation but I am sure they could give a fuck less.

3. That is quite childish and and most certainly an abuse of the feedback system while you accuse me of being abusive in the same breath. What is also convenient is you refuse to use your actual name instead using an account that was registered last month, and is meaningless for you to do your dirty work to abuse the feedback system. I rectified the mistake I made, I corrected the value in the trust. I have nothing to apologize for because I have no sock puppets, and I am not the perpetrator here.

4. So threats against me now for the activities of others? From people on the default trust no less? I thought leaving negatives to people for non scamming related activities from the default trust list was frowned upon. You don't see the irony in you threatening me with negative default trust for me speaking up about systematic abuse here? Of course not, that is what hypocrites call "logical".

Quote from: MadZ on November 10, 2014, 09:39:24 AM

You also point out that many other members in default trust give out trust ratings for similar reasons (I believe you mentioned Vod as an example). What distinguishes them from you is that if a valid complaint were to be made against one of their trust ratings and there was a consensus that they were wrong to give such a rating, they would probably remove it, while you refused to do so.

Complaints are made against VOD constantly. Who decides which are valid?... The staff and mods...
As far as refusing to remove it, that's not true. I gave Armis the opportunity to have my trust removed from his account if he deleted his multiple slanderous posts in my marketplace threads and stayed out of them in the future. Instead of taking this option which would restore us both to our original state he chose to continue to escalate the process as he did from his very first post to a point where we both suffered permanent effects. This forum is little more than a cartel, and I expect their toadies to show up here in numbers so try to slander me for refusing to submit to their coercion in order to moderate the trust ratings left by users (while claiming they don't).