Quote from: Longenecker on November 10, 2014, 11:13:29 PM

Quote from: The-C-Word on November 10, 2014, 11:12:01 PM

So, just trying to confirm what Dan has stated in the new XC thread, he won't be developing for UTIL but finding a fitting lead dev for that project?

I bet the "fitting" lead dev will be anonymous... aka, Dan Metcalf.

Seriously guys? Prom said in the skype logs that UtilityCoin was Dan's project. Prom has admitted that that conversation was real. And Dan has admitted that he has a relationship with Prom.

DO THE MATH.

First of all, there is no math involved in what you're speaking about.

Second, in order for the BlockNET to work as envisioned, the features need to be spread out amongst different blockchains/coins.

There is thus an incentive for the BlockNET to keep UTIL's features in development.

Dan is already overseeing BlockNET. What is wrong with him overseeing UTIL?

This is about collective success. No coin left behind.

If you take the hype, fear, and paranoia, out of your argument, you have none.