Quote from: patrolman on November 11, 2014, 01:20:02 AM

Quote from: georgem on November 11, 2014, 01:08:09 AM

Quote from: coins101 on November 11, 2014, 12:56:29 AM

When you become a member of something, you have different set of rights and protections. There are terms and conditions....which brings in regulators - potentially.

Excellent point.
What happens if someone is unhappy with the subscription and wants his money back.
He could sue you... but wait, who would he sue? The darkcoin foundation?

On closer examination, all this doesn't make any sense.

But what if those subscriptions aren't really subscriptions, but something else?
Paying a fee is mandatory.... but voluntarily paying for a service/subscription makes you a "customer" who needs to be "protected" by government. lol

How about credits? You pay whatever you want up front and it goes to miners/masternodes and the credits appear in the client, allowing you to perform a certain number of Darksend mixes or to send anonymised funds. Once the credit is gone, you have to top up again. I'm not sure about the technical side of whether the credit could be verified though.

That the session model again. Which I still think is the way to go

Because you get what you pay for. X coins by y rounds = session fee,