Quote from: BitMos on November 11, 2014, 08:52:19 PM

Quote from: RodeoX on November 11, 2014, 06:22:11 PM

This is the freedom fight of our lives and hardly anyone understands why.

You seem so passionate, I don't understand why? Could you please explain me more?

A loss of net neutrality means that their will be priority routes on the information highway.
It also insinuates that any organization has the ability to control and throttle all types of traffic
It would have massive impacts on incumbents who can prioritize traffic, slow down new competitors because they couldn't pay for the priority channels and damage open source projects like Bitcoin and Bitorrent by restricting their traffic.

Any limitation on the ability to acquire information freely, on restricting content that is contrarian to the mainstream media, or on accessing information leads down a route of totalitarian control, similar to the governments having strong controls on newspaper television and radio stations, regulation on the internet will result in information control and restrictions that we do not have now and it begins with net neutrality.

https://time.com/3578255/conservatives-net-neutrality-poll/

Some 83% of voters who self-identified as very conservative were concerned about the possibility of ISPs having the power to influence content online. Only 17% reported being unconcerned. Similarly, 83% of self-identified conservatives thought that Congress should take action to ensure that cable companies do not monopolize the Internet or reduce the inherent equality of the Internet by charging some content companies for speedier access.

Other people argue though that if you can't pay for it then screw you.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/11/10/7-reasons-net-neutrality

Perhaps taxing the internet...
__

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/11/upshot/a-super-simple-way-to-understand-the-net-neutrality-debate.html?_r=0&abt=0002&abg=1

Simply put the internet is the electricity of the 21st century

The Internet is like electricity. It is fundamental to the 21st century economy, as essential to functioning in modern society as electricity. It is a public utility. We cannot allow Internet service providers (ISPs) to restrict the best access or to pick winners and losers in the online marketplace for services and ideas, the president said in his written statement.

In the presidents logic, and that of the Internet content companies that are the most aggressive supporters of net neutrality, just as your electric utility has no say in how you use the electricity they sell you, the Internet should be a reliable way to access content produced by anyone, regardless of whether they have any special business arrangement with the utility.

Those arguing against net neutrality, most significantly the cable companies, say the Internet will be a richer experience if the profit motive applies, if they can negotiate deals with major content providers (the equivalent of cable channels) so that Netflix or Hulu or other streaming services that use huge bandwidth have to pay for the privilege.

(The argument though is that under the pay model, there is an incentive to build new infrastructure in order to get more profit hence a faster internet)

Hope that helped a bit.