Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 02:19:04 PM

Quote from: cryptico on November 12, 2014, 02:14:47 PM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 02:03:02 PM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 02:00:16 PM

Quote from: Dungor on November 12, 2014, 12:49:48 PM

Quote from: synechist on November 12, 2014, 11:38:11 AM

Quote from: dan7777777 on November 12, 2014, 11:35:40 AM

Will the blocknet be helpful in any way to count this:

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/11/12/obama-wants-to-now-fully-regulate-the-internet-as-a-public-utility/

I'm not sure, but Mr. Obama would be mistaken if he were to think that the internet fell under US jurisdiction.

It's a continual source of bafflement to me that US institutions so often appear unaware of their merely national authority.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/28/seven-people-keys-worldwide-internet-security-web

The internet as we know is placed in the US, it is way more centralized than most people know. This is why we need blockchain tech on a platform other than the big fiber lines infrastructure.

How could this happen. Could websites be built inside the blocknet somehow? Web 3.0?

XC should commence developing its web 3.0 distributed content server very soon. It'll serve anything from webpages, ads, and personal files from XC nodes.

And of course any Blocknet-enabled node will be able to use this service.

So Is it web 3.0 coming before ReV3 Arlyn? Do not over promise please. We are still waiting for Rev2.5.

As far as I'm aware this is the plan.

Be aware though that it is not "web 3.0" in total, it's a distributed content server, which is a web 3.0 concept. It'll be years before the internet in general becomes "web 3.0."

(Also, bear in mind the difference between "promises" (i.e. firm commitments) and prospective outlooks ("should", "probably", etc.), and try to keep your expectations in proportion to them. I know you're very keen to see new XC tech - and that's great - but you run the risk of frustrating yourself needlessly.)

Distribute content server would be great to start to market Xmixers what XC already have and what should have been the biggest selling point if they would have brought revenue. we already have Xmixer technology that can bring in fees and this would be a great incentive for people to get Xmixers.

I know you have an Insider view on development and maybe you are not concerned the fact is that from the outside everything that we see it is a bit messy and I was expecting some tech released for XC and as well a clear date for Rev2.5. Lately it seems that Dan is developing things further away from the timeline and not focusing on deliver what was expected but I understand that he has reasons to do so. It seems you want to get into too many stuff toghether and want to release everything toghether.

Before till Xmixer release the releases where much more in line with the timeline and there were not so many underdelivered announcements. I think you should talk toghether and reconsider to rebuilt a new timeline stick to it with reasonable dates till Rev 3 and Deliver. Do not let Dan roam loose releasing random updates and making announcements that then he cannot fulfill it looks messy and it is frustrating to witness.