Quote from: LoupGaroux on June 09, 2012, 11:39:40 PM

Quote from: phantomcircuit on June 09, 2012, 08:33:49 PM

Quote from: Krakonos on June 09, 2012, 03:45:48 PM

Hey,

I just went to http://www.bitcoinica.com/ and found some marketing stuff, the one you usually find on expired domains that someone registered for advertising purposes and quick gain on people, that came for the old site.

Does that mean that the domain expired?

Unfortunately the previous domain registrar put incorrect DNSSEC records into com. which is causing DNS to break in strange ways.

Uh huh... just another chapter in this tale of incredibly bad luck for this whole debacle. Folks, it's going Option Six bigger than hell- there are no payments coming, there is no restitution being made- you have all been fleeced.

I'm on record in stating that I had faith in Option 6: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=84042.msg944262#msg944262

Quote from: ninjarobot on June 09, 2012, 11:42:26 PM

Did Bitcoinica join a DRS (dispute resolution scheme) when it became a FSP in NZ?

If so, which one and what is your internal procedure to deal with complaints?

http://www.business.govt.nz/fsp/about-the-fspr/dispute-resolution-schemes

Quote

Most financial service providers (FSPs) who provide a service to retail clients must belong to an approved dispute resolution scheme (DRS) or the government-established reserve (dispute resolution) scheme, under section 48 of the Financial Service Providers (Registration and Dispute Resolution) Act 2008 (FSPA).

FSPs must join a dispute resolution scheme before beginning their application for registration as a financial service provider.

Membership in a DRS is mandatory for FSPs who provide a service to retail clients, because it provides consumers with an avenue for redress when a dispute arises with their financial service provider. Membership in a scheme is a pre-requisite for registration as an FSP.

Customers (individuals, or small organisations with 19 or less full time equivalent employees - FTEs) of a financial service provider can access the dispute resolution scheme the FSP belongs to, free of charge. However, the complainant must take their complaint to the FSP first. FSPs need to have some internal procedures to deal with complaints.

All dispute resolution schemes will have rules about the complaints process, what the FSP has to do, and what complaints they cover.

(I currently have no proof for the following, but opt to include it for the lulz, in memory of Eduard Khil--RIP.)

Quote

The reason why Matthew N Wright wants me to shut up, is because he is involved with bitcoinica and according to him, he helped and advised Zhou in the process.

Matthew, you are included in the lawsuit. You knew about the shady deals going on behind the curtain and did not inform the community. How much money did you make by assisting this deal?

Maria.

Although I was saving this for a special occasion, I thought I would share some of it now. Don't be greedy, for there's plenty to go around.