Quote from: PatMan on November 13, 2014, 05:30:04 AM

Thank you Bitmain - that sheds a bit more light on the subject. So you're keeping it python based then? (please say no)

Please tell your R&D crew to ignore p2pool.info - it is useless & will only create confusion for noobs. Better if it was gone Tongue

A bit light? Grin

He is bulshiting you boys Grin

There is no way to do some of the things as described Wink

Any way i am damn sure that eventualy if when someday famous git will be published it will reval the whole truth. Grin

As i said there is no free lunch with %0 fee and dedi servers all over the world Grin

Unless BITMAIN is in the charity decentralisation business Grin

----------------
Quote:
--------------
There are two factors to address for the payout stability of smaller miners. 1st, the total hashrate of p2pool protocol is small and the payout of the whole network is not stable right now. We need to increase the p2pool protocol's total network hashrate.

The above seems legit. No irony...
-----------------------
BUT the below is just a plain big bullshit from Literature class Grin

2nd, small miners' hashrate is low. We think we can help this by set up a good protocol mining agent.
Shocked

Small miner is small and it will stay small unless new HW is purchased. There is no software magic to make small miner a big one Wink

The issue is getting worst especially with p2pool. Period!

PatMan you can ask BITMAIN if he is merge mining that will be a good start Grin

And the answer is...?