Quote from: Bagatell on November 15, 2014, 05:27:47 PM

Quote from: brg444 on November 15, 2014, 05:18:53 PM

Quote from: cypherdoc on November 15, 2014, 04:13:15 PM

Cmon man, do your job.

In JR's scenario, Blockstream would make Billions!

did you sell your Bitcoins yet?

remember, the inextricable link between BTC and its blockchain is broken, Bitcoin is going to be destroy sooner or later!

You're beginning to sound like Shroomskit and Lamchop.

Funny I thought the same of cypherdoc.

I've been presenting arguments for my case absent of trolling for the past few weeks but it seems cypherdoc does not want to address them or has no answer for them. At this point, I'm just enjoying feeding his paranoia.

I mean, this guy seriously believes that anyone who cares enough to debunk his FUD and misinformation is somehow tied or working for Blockstream. That is some serious case of paranoid dementia.

Looks at this :

Quote from: cypherdoc on November 15, 2014, 04:00:34 AM

who really needs absolute anonymity? sure, for illegal stuff. but most of us don't do that.

Quote from: cypherdoc on October 27, 2014, 09:57:19 PM

i believe the vast majority of BTC holders value anonymity. therefore perfect anonymity should be better than pseudonymity.

since that's the case, why wouldn't you then move ALL your BTC into scBTC?

Or this

Quote from: cypherdoc on November 15, 2014, 12:55:13 AM

fine. LET THEM USE FEDERATED SERVERS. are you deaf? that won't hurt Bitcoin like the SPVproof.

Quote from: cypherdoc on November 14, 2014, 06:59:54 PM

this breaks the legitimate inextricable link btwn the currency unit BTC and its blockchain (MC). that, in itself, will destroy Bitcoin.

This gentleman is very, very confused.