Quote from: brg444 on November 16, 2014, 08:00:05 AM

Quote from: cypherdoc on November 16, 2014, 07:57:10 AM

Quote from: brg444 on November 16, 2014, 07:55:42 AM

Quote from: Adrian-x on November 16, 2014, 07:49:06 AM

Quote from: brg444 on November 16, 2014, 07:28:56 AM

p

Quote from: cypherdoc on November 14, 2014, 04:14:07 PM

the basis of my argument is that the BTC unit cannot be separated from its blockchain (mainchain) w/o breaking Bitcoin as Money. imo, sidechains allow this and if you read their whitepaper, their core assumption is that they they can be separated.

What you don't care about Bitcoin's Sound Money principles anymore Angry

How dare you ! Cry

They're one and the same point, I don't understand your pitch?

My pitch?

My pitch is that cypherclown has been championing the danger of breaking the holy link between the BTC unit and its blockchain for the past 50 pages but now that he FINALLY realizes federated server sidechains creates this exact mechanism and that these are implementable natively he has yet again moved the goal post to another fallacious argument.

wat?! lol!

always misportraying my position to try and make yourself look good. girl.

girl

where is that even coming from

by the way I'm standing right here on the corner waiting for you to formulate your next sidechains doomsday scenario. better make it a good one this time, the last few were a bit too shallow on paranoia Undecided

everything i said makes sense even with federated servers. they're INSIGNIFICANT to Bitcoin as they don't change the source code. that's all i care about.