Quote from: JakeThePanda on November 17, 2014, 02:48:41 PM

Quote from: $dakini on November 17, 2014, 10:06:42 AM

Usually the scammers dont stick with a single coin as once the profit is made, they stop logging into their account and move on to their next scam.

He hasn't stuck to a single coin. He collaborated with Jasinlee and Fibonacci on 2 other pump and dump coins. Kalgecin was involved in Pesa and at least one other that I know about. Who knows how many others there are.

And what is my crime in pesa? I don't think you guys understand the whole point behind open source and github..... When you have an open source project, and on a site like github, expect people unrelated to the project submit bugs and patches. That's the whole point why git was created. To help people help open source projects. While making cache, I did browse through loads of coins code to see how stuff was implemented. And I did contribute my patches if i saw any problem. If a person submits a patch, it's not a conspiracy, it's a piece of code. If I submit a patch to say, the android project, would you start saying that i'm involved in it?

Quote from: rdnkjdi on November 17, 2014, 01:44:32 PM

Quote

Who has access to the wallets?

Like I said PER JASINLEE there are no stolen funds anymore.

But that aside even I understand multisig accounts. There's no reason in the world to give dev unilateral control of funds even if that was your excuse.

What a joke. He steals millions and you defend him. Which pretty much guarantees you guys are still joined at the hip. I suppose he's using you to try to pump his massive Cache hodlings

Can you link where he said he got ALL the coins back. Cos i remember him asking me to log on to the site server and salvage any coins I could find. And when I compared to the theoretical total balance from the site database, it was a bit less than half. I don't know, maybe he did recover the rest, but haven't heard of that.

Let's get to the multisig part. When a user uses a site that accepts coin deposits, each user gets a unique deposit address for his account. And all those addresses are generated by the wallet. From what i've read, multisig works only for a set few predetermined public keys "combined" into one..... see any problem here? And let's assume i'm wrong, and there's a way to dynamically add them into the set, when was multisig started to be widely accepted? and when did fibonacci start accepting deposits?

I'm not defending him, I'm simply pointing out facts, and not jumping to conclusions like some people.

Since when is it ok to bash someone, and not ok to try and see a different perspective? I've seen that most people here just see the negative in almost anyone. They don't stop and think and dig around, whatever negative thing they read about someone, they take it as a fact, and when someone says otherwise, it's a conspiracy and he should be hanged and burned. What happened with fibonacci isn't good, it's bad I agree, and jasin shouldn't have put so much trust in some people and should have handled things better. I'm not saying he's all innocent, but maybe he's not the only one to blame? maybe he really did mean well, but things turned ugly? People who did invest a lot in the project, i feel you, i understand that it's painful. But honestly, anyone investing thousands of dollars in some crypto stuff, at this point, is to partly blame, it's a known fact that this field is VERY unstable and filled with shady people. Never the less, those who lost their money, should find a way to recover it, but not start going around posting bullshit and blindly pointing firgers at the first name they see.