Quote from: locohammerhead on November 17, 2014, 07:08:37 PM

Quote from: iGotSpots on November 17, 2014, 07:04:02 PM

Quote from: locohammerhead on November 17, 2014, 06:44:43 PM

Optimization is an after thought here IMO. Also wondering. Why does it cost less overall to send one large transaction than it does to send small ones? Ex: a transfer of 600 BALLS is around 11 BALLS in fees. 150 BALLS is about 6.70 BALLS. This shows me the favor is leaning towards the high rollers are they can send larger amounts for less.

This shows you don't understand how transaction fees are calculated, since it uses size of transaction not amount of coins sent (for pretty much every coin out there)

I've said this at least 20 times now and it's not like we are calculating fees differently than other coins do, just use a higher amount

Bullshit. That's why I can run consistent tests where the fee percentage is LOWER the more coins I send. Since you claim it uses transaction size shouldn't it be the more BALLS being sent at once the more data being sent hence it should cost MORE overall to send those coins? Yet somehow it doesn't. Odd....

*edited post to add "overall"*

Go look at the code. You can clearly see where and how fees are calculated. Before you make yourself look more stupid, it's based on bytes, not amount sent