Quote from: Chargin on November 26, 2014, 01:08:35 AM

10% per round is a good suggestion, however that will be a lot of work and will increase the timeframe for returning all of the Karma. What do you propose the timeframe be? After 4 weeks then every 2 weeks for a total of 22 weeks or how long? Everyone please say if you think this is a good idea or not, if you like it but not the timeframe I just gave please suggest a new one.

Chargin, if the processing were done manually I agree it would be a lot more work.. if its done via a script it really isn't much work at all.. you just have a list of accounts that have been verified by whatever criteria is agreed by the community and then loop through it 10 times instead of once. you could even write the script in such a way that it just does one loop every time a button is pressed so all that anyone would need to do is press it 10 times (or until the coins run out). they would then be able to distribute coins once a day once a week or whenever is most suitable.

Quote from: Chargin on November 26, 2014, 01:08:35 AM

For the people that are suggesting relying on less than v2 username proof. Are you suggesting we either simply use v1 balances (100% provable, some people will lose 100% of their Karma) or a lower standard of evidence to prove v2 balances?

I think most people are happy to go with the V1 balances. Using the V2 balances seems like a lot more work for very little extra benefit. I was one of the first people who was able to actually trade on V2 and as socoban said (and I agree) there were very few trades done before the whole thing blew up in everyone's faces.

Quote from: Chargin on November 26, 2014, 01:08:35 AM

Everyone don't forget that at the moment you've lost 100% of your Karma on Mintpal. If you get 50% back from this process you should be very grateful to the person making the transactions with the wallet and the people on the committee.

I personally am more than happy to give a percentage of coins to the people doing the actual work to get the coins back.