Quote from: s2miner on November 26, 2014, 04:41:21 AM

Quote from: dogie on November 21, 2014, 01:35:58 AM

Quote from: s2miner on November 21, 2014, 12:39:08 AM

Quote from: dogie on November 20, 2014, 07:45:27 PM

Quote from: opentoe on November 20, 2014, 04:41:27 PM

Quote from: s2miner on November 20, 2014, 12:32:20 PM

Here is another question that very remotely might be related to firmware or may be is a non-issue.
I will be very specific. Mining on f2pool, I noticed that my old S2' s GHS is closer to what shows up on workers page of account.
But for C1 (runs on 225MHz), the miner shows 900+ GH/S(5s) and f2pool shows less say 689 (20 min avg). It goes little up and down but stays way less than the one on miner. I watched on miner consistently and that number stays close to 900 on miner. This is a one time test and I didnot repeat and could be just a temp weird situation but did get my curiosity.

Anyone can please explain this or has anyone else noticed this ever.
Am afraid to upgrade S2 firmware to new version with cgminer 4.6 for that reason bcz C1 has 4.6 (latest firmware).

Forget whatever the miner says, whatever the pool says you are getting is what hashing speed you are getting. If you are only receiving 689 that's in all intent and purposes that's like half the mining speed. These are "guaranteed" for 1000GH/s. If the hardware can't make that guarantee, does Bitmain compensate in anyway like the other companies do?

He's mining on p2p, not an actual pool.

btw, I am mining on pps pool not p2p.

Try a more mainstream pool and post a picture of your dashboard.

Which ones are more mainstream pools. I only know a few names Ghash, f2pool, BTCGuild and slush.

Ghash.io and Slush