Quote from: TECSHARE on November 28, 2014, 05:21:44 AM

Quote from: ABitNut on November 28, 2014, 05:15:18 AM

Quote from: onemorebtc on November 28, 2014, 04:57:48 AM

Quote from: ABitNut on November 28, 2014, 04:55:22 AM

Niann damaged his own account by lending it out for money. You can't blame anyone else for it.

he made it only public because he wanted to make others aware of a scammer...
thats nice of him. nobody (except maybe mods) knows how many people he contacted and asked for a loan

Regardless, lending out your account is bad for trust. Saying that the damage is done only when someone else published that is silly.

Of course, Niann was placed between a rock and hard place because someone else used their account in a way they didn't approve of... After that their choice was to either make it known that they rent out their account or risk being linked to some $9000 dollar loans.

This whole line of reasoning is irrelevant. These two made an agreement. Verification violated it. Therefore he has no more rights under that agreement correct?

I didn't make any statement about the actual deal. I just responded to the claim that Verification damaged the trust of the account. My view on it is that Niann damaged their trust themselves.

I don't really feel like making a statement on the actual agreement or whether it was violated by any party simply because I don't know the details. Also I feel it is unlikely that Verification and Niann will find a compromise that will settle this issue no matter how "lawyering" anyone does.