Quote from: Martin958 on December 01, 2014, 10:35:59 AM

Quote from: vicvelcro on December 01, 2014, 09:10:21 AM

Governments and other agencies are putting high priority on 'Dark' targets for surveillance. 'Dark' is like wearing a bright orange shirt that screams "I'm Up To No Good".

Dark tech is the way to go for maintaining any level of personal privacy. Wearing the 'Dark' name is counterproductive. I suggested a name change 6 weeks ago (or close to that) for this exact reason. At the time, the majority were in disagreement. I presented my case, and then laid it to rest. I never brought it up again before now.

'Dark' tech, but drop the 'Dark' label. Also, TOR network users are targeted for high priority surveillance simply due to the way TOR network is perceived by the authorities as a major security risk. Using 'Dark' as a label and using TOR network is pretty much guaranteeing that there is a high probability of BEGGING for the wrong kind of attention from the wrong kind of people.

Quote from: Furio on December 01, 2014, 09:03:18 AM

I'm convinced that goverments and agencies want to suvail everyone in crypto sooner or later, my convincion is that dark is the way to go, looks promising to let the devs of darks work together on dark tech

All of this is bang on the money for me.

Besides TOR and DARK focused coins attract bad investment people. E.g. the types who will try the P&D game.

If we want to make this a long term successful coin it needs commercial assistance to maintain the price at a reasonable value. TOR and DARK wont do this.

LitecoinPrivate Grin