Quote from: richiela on December 03, 2014, 04:53:44 AM

Quote from: anticlimax on December 03, 2014, 04:34:57 AM

Quote from: Bittrex-Bill on December 03, 2014, 04:28:20 AM

Quote from: purplejaguar on December 03, 2014, 04:02:03 AM

Quote from: anticlimax on December 03, 2014, 03:59:27 AM

Bittrex had no problem adding CRACK... Lol
Good stance.. Crack is much better than meth?

LSD, DOPE etc etc

Bittrex' standards seem arbitrary.

I think the METH analogy isn't quite accurate in this case. Gimp is a derogatory term for a disabled person. While we like joke coins and freedom of speech, this could be considered derogatory and we've decided to draw the line on it.

In regards to METH, this was a personal favor I asked from the other members of Bittrex to not list. I've personally had friends go through terrible struggles due to the drug and decided to not have it listed even as a joke.

I apologize if our standards seem arbitrary. Our stance is to reject very few coins from our exchange. Most coins don't make it because we don't have time to list them all. In the few cases we've recently chosen to not list, it came down to a few areas. 1) potential unlicensed securities 2) coins whose purpose are to redeem drugs that are considered illegal in the united states 3) and in this most recent example, derogatory terms.

What analogy?

I'm talking about how you figure meth is worse than crack.
Regardless of your personal experiences, what kind of message are you sending the public by stating that you don't add offensive coins, yet you add offensive coins anyway.

You just dilute your credibility.
I hear a lot of excuses, none of which really make a lot of sense.

Same thing goes for Euph.

Your actions suggest cann/dope is less trouble than research chems, yet marijuana is considered illegal by the federal government in the USA.

I find your logic hard to grasp.

I did not come on here to debate what is offensive or not; I'm clarifying our position on why we are not listing. I am also not here to debate our stance on drug related coins. I appreciate your opinion but we have legal counsel to advise us on those matters. I came on to address this silliness that we are trying to get any fee from any coin. We have never asked for fees for listing, and out of the 500+ wallets we've launched less than 5% have paid to be listed.

richie

You guys sound like politicians.
I appreciate the effort you put into dodging my questions.