Quote from: loshia on December 03, 2014, 05:18:45 AM

Quote from: AJRGale on December 03, 2014, 04:20:38 AM

MMkay, here's a question, are the driver documentation for cgminer/bfgminer going to be released to the respected software owners, or are you just going to fork your own spin of the software to work it the way you want it to?

also, 82 Euro / 101.50USD / 120.75AUD, Excluding shipping, for a 150GHs unit that would probably only do 100GHs pool side.. Wheres the Ausie resellers? Buy up 100 of them will ya?

and please tell me that you're not forcing people to use this for only your 1/20,000,000 (i did math right? didn't i?) chance game? i see it as an entry level miner, letting people decide what they do with it...

All Technobit boards do have patches for cgminer. In other words it is fully open source. Despite other devices from day one all Technobit products DO show hashing rate exactly and dupes and hw errors are not accounted AS HASHESHS. The only diference are pool rejects but they are between 0.1-0.3% with stratum so in other words when you take avarage speed from the scree and multiply it by (100 -hw%) you will get hw rate as shown from the pool

a patched version of cgminer does not mean documentation to the developers of cgminer so they can implement the drivers for said device correctly.
If technobit has the drivers and gives them up in the fork tree of cgminer, unless technobit tells them how to edit and modify the drivers, its up to technobit to implement it correctly. so guess what, when a new cgminer comes out, no updates to the drivers are going to be implemented, any security holes, memory leaks, chip killing code will be present in the next patch and there after...

and i don't just mean cgminer, Luke-jr's BFGMiner as well. no instructions for the code = no updates. (add human readable points in the code explaining what each part does yeah? better then nothing)

all im saying is technobit better not do what rocketminer does and ignore the mining devs. (and run off and try and centralise bitcoin via amhash)

also, look at the times on that screen shot, 1 minute run time, my "New R-Box" shows the same hash rates as that in that amount of time. then after 24 hours its down to 65-70GHs.

my 333Mhs Block Erupter could pull 66GHs in 1 minute, i should sell it as " The Only 66MH/s USB Block Erupter in the WORLD" ignore the fact that the software doesn't have enough measurement points to even out the numbers yet.

this thing would be good, not saying its bad, just trying to kill the hype of "OMG TEH HASHS, LIEK II GETZ IT ALL!" what you see on screen does not relate to hashes at the pool, 150Ghs minus Client side rejects - error rejects - pool side rejects (which may be sent back to the client as rejected) = pool side hashes. also, not all silicon is going to be perfect, there maybe a bad egg in the stock. not all calculation processes will be working, if that silicon chip has 1024 calculators, there maybe one or 2 dead, you could be unlucky and have the chip with a bug flying into the light on the lithograph (ignore the fact there is a better chance on getting a btc block with this then that happening with most die casting facilities)

also, that screen shot is modified, no showing the accepted rejected and dupes in the list (lets see that, how many dupes are there? common please), ~~the R:0 and H:0 does not line up on the other lettering.~~ on 5th look, it does line up, counted the pixels.. i think.

now, being someone with little play money, and stuck to only buy "hobbyist grade" mining equipment, i do want this, i just don't want it to fall in the piece of shit category. people like me get burned by this, whilst the rich folk get all the good stuff and get richer.

Quote from: raskul on December 03, 2014, 07:56:25 AM

here is the full bundle with TP-link included available now:

https://technobit.refersion.com/l/1e5.19333 (test link - affiliate program not currently available)

"DICE"+ preprogramed TP-link + USB cable pack
SHIPMENT18-th December 2014
first production batch

nice nice nice