Quote from: bitpop on December 03, 2014, 06:32:48 PM

Quote from: CoinFire on December 03, 2014, 06:18:37 PM

Quote from: NeonTranceBadger on December 03, 2014, 06:07:56 PM

Quote from: CoinFire on December 03, 2014, 05:57:54 PM

Quote from: bitpop on December 03, 2014, 05:54:53 PM

Quote from: CoinFire on December 03, 2014, 05:41:30 PM

Quote from: bitpop on December 03, 2014, 05:23:18 PM

Ok.. josh confirmed Authy ceo confirmed his statement. What statement? And authy Twitter doesn't have this so called confirmation.

Also fighting all this "fud and attacks" makes him even more guilty. You don't see real businesses replying to so called attacks.

Actually, the CEO confirmed our quote: https://twitter.com/danielpalacio/status/537250571875790849

Not Josh's quote.

Edit: CoinSource fact checked us who was fact checking Garza.

He said this yesterday https://twitter.com/gawceo/status/540028154996596737

Well, this should be pretty interesting. He told us something completely different, then confirmed to another site what he told us was accurate.

If he decides to back peddle we still have the full DKIM signed emails etc to use in court defending ourselves.

So he told us they didn't tell Garza that, he told a second source he didn't tell Garza that, and now he is suddenly telling Garza?

This could be very interesting.

You should check with the Authy CEO and president. Notice how he only tags the authy twitter account and not the presidents https://twitter.com/marcboroditsky

Our lawyers are going to be emailing him as the previous two statements to us, and one to another site are now included in our legal defense.

What was the context of authy?