Quote from: toknormal on December 05, 2014, 10:04:27 AM

Unfortunately it's you who's doing the fudding. Possibly unwittingly, but still doing it.

If you don't know the answer to the OP's question just say so. But don't start spamming everyone with your own agenda which is that these things don't matter - they do.

For example. You're trying to promote the idea that liquidity and volatility are not relevant till much further down the line - they're something for later. I've just given you a pile of reasons why they do matter right now and why they present a huge barrier to adoption. The principle barrier to adoption is exactly the point that the OP brought up which I highlighted in bold in my last post.

As far as I can see only two posts in this entire thread remotely address that point. The rest are all just people throwing their toys out of the pram because they don't really understand what he's talking about and accusing him of "fud" as you are above.

No you're wrong.
Yes I know the answer, but it's not worth it. Your answers on the other hand aren't valid either.
Look at the responses of the "wisest" members (or the lack of). That should explain.

Quote from: Soros Shorts on December 05, 2014, 10:50:07 AM

I think that most people who responded are not receptive to the idea of gaining mass adoption at the expense of depressing the value of the underlying and having the profits going to some derivatives holder. I certainly am not.

and the ones who didn't respond.