Quote from: drasted on December 14, 2014, 01:30:29 AM

Quote from: jjdub7 on December 14, 2014, 12:36:15 AM

Quote from: Chris_Sabian on December 14, 2014, 12:04:27 AM

Quote from: jjdub7 on December 13, 2014, 11:56:20 PM

Quote from: vortex1878 on December 13, 2014, 10:40:12 PM

Quote from: jjdub7 on December 13, 2014, 10:22:57 PM

Quote from: Mabsark on December 13, 2014, 11:22:44 AM

Quote from: jjdub7 on December 13, 2014, 05:18:23 AM

Yo, bros...I got two words for ya's: cheap shares.

For real though, the fucking bull run from The Lion King where Mufasa died lasted longer than that schizophrenic pump attempt. And the bid on the float can't survive another dropped board seat.

Why would anyone listen to your advice? You clearly sold your shares for 0.098 BTC for a "sad loss" just before the news of the sample chips. You're either not very good at trading or are trying to manipulate the market.

Also, from what I can see, very few shares traded down to around 0.13 BTC, but most trades are increasing in price. It's almost like someone is trying to cause a dump. I wonder who that could be. Roll Eyes

My portfolio's public for the record. I was just saying whoever pumped it made a poor effort because the volume would've been on-balance in a real breakout.

You are simply pathetic. I really feel sorry for you.

...? If you're referring to my comments about the price movements and disagree, then tell me - what news or other positive info should have driven an upward price movement right now?

Friedcat had originally projected dividends for August, and only now we've found out the team's been able to reconcile the shareholder ledger. You tell me if you think this stock has warranted a 40% price jump in one week's time on zero info. Not ONE of the AMHash IPOs has sold out, and as far as revenue goes, those aren't pulling in the money anyway.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=888260.0

Brb, going to put a foot through the fucking wall.

Have you been posting in this thread with your eyes closed? Some of the comments you've replied to are directly about the BE300 news. Like this comment in regards to the stats on the new chip

Quote from: jjdub7 on December 12, 2014, 07:04:07 AM

Quote from: jimmothy on December 12, 2014, 06:57:33 AM

Bitfury hopes to achieve 0.2 j/gh with their next gen. AM achieved 0.2 j/gh.

I hate to say it, but the initial limitation of shades outstanding by BitFountain may have damned ASICMINER unless it can gain access at minimum to global university-grade research facilities in a strategic, peer-level, media-critiqued and publicized partnership. Otherwise, real men with real knowledge, money, and balls, (and access to real intellectual capital to compete via the damn money and the explicit consent of regulators...will blow AM so far off the map that shareholders will be stuck settling for ~25k satoshi divs for years before the P/E discrepancy between BitFury and AM is reconciled, just like the scenario with Intel (sorry, not IBM) and AMD at present.

First off, I'd consider myself an investor, not a trader. I have been watching this thread, and in every post I've ever commented on or opinion I've put forth, I've affirmed friedcat & team's engineering ability and systems-related skills. I'm kicking myself for not thinking to exit when the chip specs broke rather than ahead of time like I did. However, I just can't help but feel that AM's lost its grip on the consumer market moving forward.

The company's worth ~$18.5 million (up to $20-s millions on a good USD pricing day). Now either that's moderately overvalued or extremely undervalued. Which scenario it is depends on how they're going to bring their products to market. BitFury has been taking in more than AM's entire market cap in its recent rounds...again, I just can't help but think that we're going to be stuck in a David v. Goliath situation here like with AMD vs. Intel.

I took the BTC from the sale, sold it for USD, and put it into TSMC, so don't think I'm bearish for the sake of being bearish or not reading into what's posted here.