Quote from: MrTeal on December 15, 2014, 04:29:39 AM

Quote from: dogie on December 15, 2014, 12:11:59 AM

Quote from: MrTeal on December 14, 2014, 11:29:33 PM

Second, you devalued your own name when you went from being a seemingly legit manufacturer of hardware based on other people's boards, to just making up impossible specs and faking "proof" of them.
Third, I did get an official response from your company before I posted negative feedback. That official response was handwaving about a magic board and a faked cgminer screenshot.

Allegedly falsified. What would you do to make it right if its not faked?

There's two things there. Not only do the WU values not match the hash rate, but the reported hash rate is literally a physical impossibility at the reported frequency. And yes, I am using literally correctly.
Honestly I tried to give them every chance to say that they just made a mistake, but they're just sticking with it. 860GH/s is a physical impossibility at 950MHz. Even outside of the extremely dubious claims on the power efficiency, there are several things wrong with what was posted. Is it possible that they ran that on an original pentium and the fdiv bug made the frequency and has hate much higher than they should be? Well, no. But even if it were, you rerun the tests and update with the real values.

Not that it matters, but if hit 900GH/s and 0.65J/GH at the wall, I would remove the negative trust, add positive, buy a Zeus, and hire them any time I need a board design done on top of a big public apology.

Sounds good, lets see how it goes.