Quote from: oblixster on December 17, 2014, 04:31:23 AM

Quote from: inBitweTrust on December 17, 2014, 02:03:37 AM

Josh Garza @ Gawminers has been repeatedly caught lying to clients and deleting posts to cover up negative publicity, despite this they have some evidence they are actually partially mining their sold hash rate.

They have - No public mining address / no user selectable pool, Open ended IPO , and a referral program that doesn't add up all indicating they are partial ponzi's and fractionally reserve mining.

Hashie has No public mining address / no user selectable pool, No endorsement from any asic vendor, No relevant pictures of their hardware and datacenter, Open ended IPO, Referral programs that don't add up, Anonymous operators, .... all indicating that it is clearly a ponzi.

It is trivially easy to prove these companies have the hashpower they claim with the blockchain. Why aren't they doing so?

P.S... I quote the relevant spots merely to be concise and for readability, as long as you don't edit your comments people cannot take you out of context and I have no intention in quote mining.

Would be very easy to prove their own hash power like you said. I don't know what their intentions are but I won't call them ponzi's yet. Partial mining and not showing any hash power is however suspicious enough to remove them both from my website (done). Something shady is clearly going on.

Simple, they ssaw the succes of PB, and thought, we can do that better Grin