Quote from: fluffypony on December 18, 2014, 03:46:02 PM

Quote from: erok on December 18, 2014, 03:23:53 PM

Quote from: fluffypony on December 18, 2014, 03:21:01 PM

Not sure if I'm misunderstanding Longenecker or everyone else is. My initial comments were made after reviewing 1 of the 2 commits to the "anon" branch, the 2nd commit didn't exist at the time. It would be impossible for me to have foreknowledge as to what would be contained in the commit, and any idiot can look at the first commit and also observe that it didn't contain generateRingSignature(), nor were the verification functions wired up. I'm certainly not "busted" or "fudding", and if that's anyone's takeaway from me making a clear observation then they need to seriously revisit that persecution complex of theirs.

It would have been possible to poke your head into IRC though if you had a question.

*edit* Also, are you really trying to advertise for Monero here?

I didn't have a question - my comments were because someone posted it to the Monero subreddit - "ShadowCash Ring Signature Whitepaper released -- Any comments?"

And as pookielax31 surmised, I am part of the Monero Core Team. I am not here to advertise anything any more than you are here trying to be a spokesman for Julian Assange. It's just a profile signature on a forum.

Actually there is quite a difference in our signatures. You have a vested interest in yours that is quantifiable fiscally. Just because you state and others state they don't want to get into a this coin vs. that coin debate; quite frankly you literally already did that using your own coin.