Quote from: iCEBREAKER on April 04, 2016, 05:09:14 AM

Quote from: vertoe on March 29, 2015, 11:53:05 PM

no.

i left because i disagree darkcoin or however it will be called next year is not a decentralized entity. it never was but i ignored it as long as darkcoin was following the same path i was following. the path to total financial privacy. and thats why i am so upset about how this currency is lead by a single person. darkcoin is like an old conservative company with strong hierarchical comamnd structures and a single person on the top of the pyramid. evan duffield. the rebranding using a detergent name was just a step forward in creating something like apple or paypal. fuck this i tell you. what we need is a trustless, decentralized and anonymous currency. darkcoin is not decentralized as it still relies on a single person. and this reaches deep into the code base.

the core devs were just a bunch of volunteers exploited for the big thing. the extended darkcoin team was the same with even a lower place to sit on that pyramid. and what was the darkcoin foundation again? right, something to reserve some rights on some names and collect money. who nominated and voted for the foundation board? who does even know who are these guys? how did we learn about the foundation? from local news papers! the team listings kept counting names of people nobody ever noticed before. and they never committed anything visible to the community or the repository. and i was spending 25 hours a day monitory everything that happened in the darkcoin community for more than a year. the things going on here are fishy, intransparent and rely on a single entity.

i will get out and and will contribute to something decentralized and anonymous. i always hoped darkcoin could fill that void. i cant blame anyone to stay with this project. you are probably investors trying to win a gold donkey. or you are simply trying to exploit every possible vector of profit in the coins space. whatever. you are not here because darkcoin is something it claims to be.

if you disagree with my statement above, i dont care, but answer that simple question: what if evan duffield suddenly announces he quits the project tomorrow morning?

good luck

Wow. Vertoe unmasked as Kyle Hagen is one damn fine plot twist!

Quote from: TreasureSeeker on July 01, 2015, 07:22:46 PM

Quote from: myagui on July 01, 2015, 07:20:00 PM

Quote from: TreasureSeeker on July 01, 2015, 07:14:22 PM

Vertoe's account wasn't hacked, he put it up for sale, and from Vertoe's Github entry I guess it's been sold now. Start at coins101's post about donschoe.

And you know this, because? Roll Eyes

Because I've done some checking. donschoe=Vertoe.

For posterity:

Quote from: donschoe on June 25, 2015, 09:48:17 AM

Selling two hero accounts.

account 1: 550+ posts, 550+ activity, hero member, registered 2011, mixed reputation. 0.65BTC
account 2: 850+ posts, 500+ activity, hero member, registered 2014, 50+ positive reputation, no negative ratings. 0.95BTC

PM only.

Quote from: donschoe on December 10, 2014, 01:41:31 PM

Evan Duffield (Darkcoin) should be awarded the Proof of Honor 2014.

Quote from: donschoe on February 10, 2015, 01:02:33 PM

There is copyright, stating that this was developed by evan duffield and the darkcoin developers. But it's released open source under MIT license to build trust. Nobody wants a crypto built on proprietary shit.

Quote from: donschoe on January 29, 2015, 11:35:54 PM

Quote from: tokeweed on December 20, 2014, 11:45:02 AM

bump.

what's the next altcoin that'll reach 5 USD?

post now, bump thread next december. Grin

darkcoin for sure Wink

Quote from: donschoe on February 10, 2015, 12:56:24 PM

Darkcoin released InstantX to main network. https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-1-instantx-release.3923/

When are we ready?

Reads to me like Kyle Hagen's an outsider looking in oppose to being an 'in'.