Quote from: Mabsark on December 21, 2014, 06:02:15 PM

Quote from: malaimult on December 21, 2014, 05:02:43 PM

That is correct. My issue with that is that the lack of evidence of legitimacy is not evidence of a scam. The fact that you are advertising and invested in competing services is a major concern for me and makes it appear that you are attempting to increase the value of your investments.

And my problem with that, is that waiting for evidence of a scam to leave negative feedback is simply too late for that feedback to stop people being ripped off by those scams. If those "services" don't want to be labelled as ponzis, they should stop acting like ponzis and provide some evidence to potential customers that they are in fact legitimate instead of coming up with bullshit excuses why they can't provide such evidence. Far too many people are getting ripped off by such ponzis and it's up to us as a community to stop that.

I think all new cloud mining services should start out with a ponzi warning until they provide evidence of their legitimacy.

Quote from: raskul on December 21, 2014, 05:06:44 PM

i did learn a small lesson with this event. While I was so blinkered by the sheer volume of ponzis going on, I let it cloud my real judgement and Mabsark and I both did leave incorrect feedback on a recent new cloud mining operation.

Which I removed immediately upon some form of evidence of legitimacy being provided, just like I said I would.

Dude, it's called "innocent until proven guilty". Your acting like an entitled asshole and it's reflecting badly on AM obviously.