Quote from: Blazedout419 on December 21, 2014, 08:37:20 PM

Quote from: MichaelBliss on December 21, 2014, 07:53:13 PM

Quote from: Mabsark on December 21, 2014, 07:05:33 PM

Quote from: MichaelBliss on December 21, 2014, 06:27:36 PM

Dude, it's called "innocent until proven guilty". Your acting like an entitled asshole and it's reflecting badly on AM obviously.

As for calling out these ponzis reflecting badly on AM, that's complete nonsense and AMHash sales prove that.

Issue is with calling out / demanding evidence from legit companies, not the ponzis. I do see your point, I totally disagree that they should get negative trust until they prove themselves to you. Though I see the need for warning people. Haha start Mabsark's Ratings Guide to Ponzi's maybe...

I am sure these guys having default trust will not last long...Theymos already knows of the problems. Canary seems to hand out lvl 2 trust like it is going out of style and that should be fixed soon. I myself have some lvl 2 trust, but earned it..I would never negrate without proof since it carries a lot more weight. If you have no proof simple leave a neutral warning since it shows up and let others decide off of that.

Right. I would be willing to bet that Canary is going to be removed from level 1 default trust in the near future if he keeps up his behavior. This whole fiasco makes me weary of potentially investing in AM hash and would even make me willing to bet that they will end up scamming in the future