Quote from: Puppet on December 22, 2014, 01:27:55 PM

Ok, so this is another "I told you so" post, but allow me to bring this up, when I offered my bet that pbmining was a ponzi about to collapse, I didnt accept the betting terms about the website being online, and pb still paying out 'something' after x months. Instead I insisted on this: " I also want to stipulate that I win the bet if payouts substantially diverge from theoretical mining yields. So for instance if pbmining comes up with some new fee or whatever, to reduce payouts to a few satoshi, or declares being hacked/fire/whatever and begins paying out just a fraction of what would be expected based on difficulty, I still win."
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=418183.msg9684757#msg9684757

The bet wasnt made, but now you understand why I insisted on this and why I am not in the least bit surprised.

Yes now we understand Puppet, you were right, however even under my terms of the bet you still would of won. I had stated among other things. Should it be the general consensus of this form that PB has failed, that would be a fail. Besides, my own opinion, which would weigh the most is. The paying out of this dust is an attempt to create a legal loop hole. Certainly because web page is still up and paying out this dust, you would never find me challenging you on this failure on the grounds that web page is still up and paying out.